- Nurse Phyllis Hall testifies to seeing a bullet on JFK’s stretcher, supporting former Secret Service agent Paul Landis’ claim
- Landis claims to have picked up a pristine fired bullet from the back seat of the limousine and placed it on the president’s stretcher
- The bullet found matches the first piece of evidence logged by the FBI
- Both Hall and Landis believe in the possibility of multiple gunmen
It is a tale as remarkable as any I have penned in my works, dear readers. A tale that sheds new light on the tragic event that befell President John F. Kennedy on that fateful day in Dallas in the year 1963. Nurse Phyllis J. Hall, a witness present in the emergency room after the assassination, has come forward with a most astonishing claim. Her account seems to corroborate the recent bombshell revelation made by former Secret Service agent Paul Landis. They both speak of a bullet, a bullet that defies all logic and reason.
Phyllis Hall, in interviews given a decade ago, stated that she witnessed a bullet resting on the stretcher of the mortally wounded president. She described it as a bullet untouched by damage, pointing at its tip, with no signs of blunting or scarring around the shell. Her testimony resonates with Paul Landis’ claim, who now, at the age of 88, has broken his silence and shared a story that overturns the infamous ‘magic bullet’ theory.
According to Landis, he retrieved a nearly pristine bullet from the back seat of the limousine where Kennedy was shot. In an effort to preserve it as evidence, he placed it on the president’s hospital stretcher. This contradicts the official account put forth by the Warren Commission, which claimed that the bullet in question was recovered from Texas Governor John Connally’s stretcher. The Commission’s theory proposed that the ‘magic bullet’ had struck both Kennedy and Connally, yet remained almost intact.
The details provided by Phyllis Hall align eerily with the evidence found by the FBI. She describes a bullet lodged between Kennedy’s ear and shoulder, resembling the first piece of evidence logged by the bureau. This mysterious bullet, it seems, bears striking similarities to the one deemed responsible for the wounds suffered by Connally. The claims made by both Hall and Landis challenge the Commission’s conclusions and raise the possibility of multiple shooters.
Phyllis Hall openly expresses her belief in the existence of multiple gunmen and shares her fear of harassment and retaliation, which led to her delayed disclosure. It is worth noting that she was not listed among the ER personnel present during Kennedy’s treatment. She was unexpectedly pulled into the futile attempts to save the president’s life while visiting a friend. Her account, combined with Landis’ harrowing tale, throws doubt upon the notion of a lone gunman and raises questions that have lain dormant for far too long.
As a writer of tales and observer of society, I must offer my own perspective on this matter, dear readers. If the claims made by Landis hold true, it would undoubtedly compel us to reconsider what we thought we knew about that tragic day. The single-bullet theory, a cornerstone of the Warren Report, would crumble under the mounting weight of evidence that contradicts it. The possibility of multiple shooters cannot be dismissed lightly, for it resonates with the common themes that run through our literature.
In my illustrious works, such as “A Tale of Two Cities,” “Oliver Twist,” and “Great Expectations,” I explore the struggles faced by individuals in a world where powerful forces conspire against them. The notion of a grand conspiracy is not unfamiliar to me. The story of the Kennedy assassination, the alleged magic bullet, and the unfolding of events following that monumental tragedy evoke a sense of intrigue, mystery, and above all, the pursuit of truth.
It is my belief that the truth is a precious commodity, elusive and often distorted. Phyllis Hall’s bravery in coming forward after all these years, despite her fears and reservations, is a testament to the power of truth and the importance of shedding light on hidden secrets. Landis’ account reinforces this pursuit, and should be considered alongside the wealth of evidence that challenges the official narrative.
Let us not be swayed by blind allegiance to stagnant conclusions, but instead, embrace the spirit of inquiry that has driven mankind to seek answers throughout the ages. Let us, dear readers, venture forth into the realm of possibility and challenge the very foundations upon which our perceptions are built. For it is in this pursuit that we may uncover the secrets that lie shrouded in the shadows, waiting to be brought to light.
In conclusion, it is my fervent hope that the claims made by Phyllis Hall and Paul Landis receive the attention and consideration they deserve. The events surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy are not mere footnotes in history, but lingering questions that continue to haunt our collective consciousness. May we march ever forward towards the truth, for it is only through diligent inquiry that we may understand the complexities of our shared human experience.
